Drawing for THE FITNESS SNEAKER

USPTO serial 76640536

THE FITNESS SNEAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FITNESS SNEAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

MYRON AMER MYRON AMER, P.C.350 NATIONAL BOULEVARDSUITE 2BLONG BEACH, NY 11561

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025footwear, namely, sneakers with structural features to contribute to fitting comfort during use thereofACTIVEFeb 14, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 14, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 13, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 30, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 29, 2010RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Apr 9, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Mar 24, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jan 28, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 30, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 4, 2009RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Dec 4, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 4, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 4, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 29, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2009IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Oct 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 21, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 21, 2008IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED
May 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 10, 2007IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES
Nov 10, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Oct 23, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Aug 28, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 20, 2007RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Apr 20, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 28, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 28, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance