USPTO serial 76640744
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TEL-AVIV 66184, IL
TEL-AVIV 66184, IL
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and spa cosmetics made from ingredients originating from the Dead Sea, body care preparations, hair care preparations, non-medicated facial skin preparations, non-medicated toiletries, bath cosmetics, non-medicated body soak, liquid soap used in foot bath, hand cream, foot cream, eye cream, day cream for use on the face, night cream, sun guard oils and creams-all of them not medicated | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 27, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2006 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |