Drawing for GRUPO VENNUS DE AGUILILLA MICHOACAN

USPTO serial 76640846

GRUPO VENNUS DE AGUILILLA MICHOACAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RINGLE, JAMES W
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRUPO VENNUS DE AGUILILLA MICHOACAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer P. Yancy

JENNIFER P YANCY JONES, TULLAR & COOPER PCPO BOX 2266 EADS STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical sound and video recordings on tape and discsACTIVEMay 11, 1979
041Entertainment in the nature of live performance by a musical band and vocal group before concert hall audiencesACTIVEMay 11, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Sep 6, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jun 19, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Apr 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 6, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance