Drawing for AMERIKRAFT

USPTO serial 76641218

AMERIKRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERIKRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark C. Jacobs

MARK C JACOBS3033 EL CAMINO AVESACRAMENTO, CA 95821-6014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Nonmetal enclosures, namely water and refuse stationsACTIVE
012Nonmetal enclosures, namely food carts and condiment stationsACTIVE
019Plastic Building Material, namely synthetic wood dimensional lumber and custom shaped lumber made of plastic and having the look and feel of natural wood; and non-metal enclosures,namely lifeguard stands and bike racksACTIVE
020Indoor and Outdoor furniture, namely tables, picnic tables, benches, dining chairs, dining tables, chaise lounges, non-metal storage cabinets and non-metal storage bins and boxes to hold divots from golf coursesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 25, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2006AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED
Oct 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance