Drawing for THE HOPE ALLIANCE

USPTO serial 76641236

THE HOPE ALLIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HOPE ALLIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Langdon T. Owen

LANGDON T OWEN PARSONS KINGHORN HARRIS111 E BROADWAY 11TH FLSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044CHARITABLE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MEDICAL SERVICES TO UNDERDEVELOPED COUNTRIESACTIVEDec 13, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 8, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 8, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 25, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 8, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 5, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Nov 17, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 17, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 31, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jul 31, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 21, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 13, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance