USPTO serial 76642010
REDVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Listowel, Ontario, CA
Listowel, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Poultry and animal feeds, namely, starter and pre-starter feeds, formula feeds, feeds with non-medicated additives and mixed poultry and animal feeds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |