Drawing for THE LORD'S LADY OF LIBERTY I VI VII VIII IX

USPTO serial 76642097

THE LORD'S LADY OF LIBERTY I VI VII VIII IX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LORD'S LADY OF LIBERTY I VI VII VIII IX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charmiane G. Claxton

ALTON R WILLIAMS440 BRAY STATION RDCOLLIERVILLE, TN 38017-3264UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal License Plates; metal key chainACTIVE—
009Mouse Pads, Magnets; pre-recorded DVD's and Audio CD-Rom's featuring the teachings and history of God's original plan for mankind and America to walk in spiritual liberation, and the teachings and history of America's foundation on religious freedom and libertyACTIVE—
014Necklace, Bracelets, RingsACTIVE—
016Notebooks, Folders, Book Covers; Calendars; Daily planners; Letterhead Stationary; Post Cards; Pens, Pencils; Bumper StickersACTIVE—
018Tote Bags, UmbrellasACTIVE—
021Mugs, Travel Cups; Dinner Plates; Sports bottles sold emptyACTIVE—
024Small towelsACTIVE—
025T-Shirts, Polo Shirts, Sweatshirts; CapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jun 8, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 29, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2007CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2007ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 26, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 4, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance