USPTO serial 76642130
PAISANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAISANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emma Pena Madrid
EMMA PENA MADRID MARQUEZ BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL INC5801 RUE FERRARISAN JOSE, CA 95138-1857UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese, cream, cream cheese, cheese spreads, milk, fish, sardines, pork, sausages, chili,processed nuts, pork rinds, canned fruits, fruit paste, soups, soup mixes, processed beans,dried beans, processed peppers, processed tomatoes, canned vegetables, processed edible seeds, edible processed cactus, cooking oil, edible oil, vegetable oil, vegetable based food beverages, unflavored and unsweetened gelatins, candied fruits, candied nuts, chocolate milk, clam juice, eggnog, eggnog mixes, fruit conserves, fruit pectin, fruit preserves,processed vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chewing gum, flavored and sweetened gelatins, honey, pasta shells, rice, tortillas, salsa,cheese sauce, tomato sauce, spices, processed herbs, processed corn, bakery products,bakery goods, bakery desserts, breakfast cereals, cake mixes, chili sauce, chili seasoning, chocolate food beverages not dairy or vegetable based, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chutney, cinnamon, crackers, dried chili peppers, flavored ices, flavored sweetened gelatin desserts, hominy, hominy grits, ice cream drinks, sauces, seasonings, shakes, sherbet, sorbet, frozen custard, frozen yogurt, fresh pizza, pizza crust, pizza dough, pizza sauce, frozen pizzas | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Aloe vera drinks, non-alcoholic cocktail mixes, fruit juice concentrates, fruit drinks, fruit juices, aerated fruit juices, fruit nectars, vegetable juice beverages, concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, carbonated soft drinks, low calorie soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks, aerated water, aloe vera juices, fruit punch, spring water, flavored water, fruit flavored drinks, soft drinks flavored with tea, fruit flavored soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |