USPTO serial 76642351
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Burlington, Ontario, L7N 3H8, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal shower curtain rings, bathroom hampers, decorative cushions, chair pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Napkin rings not of precious metal; candle holders not of precious metal; porcelain dinnerware; stoneware, namely, tumbler, tooth brush holder, soap dish, and lotion pump dispenser, sold empty; beverage glassware; flower containers made of plastic; plastic and metal cooking utensils, namely pans, grills, cooking pots and casseroles; plastic pitcher sets; hand cream or soap dispenser; melamine dinnerware; ceramic tumbler; plastic tumbler; tumbler made of non-precious metal; soap dispenser; coasters; ironing board pads and covers | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Clothespin bags, net sweater bags, shoe bags for storage purposes, garment bags for storage, under the bed storage bags for storing valuables | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Fabric table cloths, runners, fabric napkins, fabric place mats, chair slip covers, oven mitts, potholders, terry kitchen towels, linen kitchen towels, bath towels, face cloths, bar stool covers, curtains, BBQ mitts, slip covers, bed sheets, pillow cases, comforters, duvet covers, dust ruffles, pillow shams, vinyl place mats, vinyl table cloths, shower curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Kitchen rugs, bath mats, and area rugs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |