Drawing for LOWES

USPTO serial 76642671

LOWES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOWES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006VENTILATION DUCT COMPONENTS, NAMELY METALLIC DRYER VENT DUCTSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 15, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 30, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Feb 26, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Feb 25, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Dec 28, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance