USPTO serial 76642696
NANOTEKX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOTEKX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Curcio
ROBERT CURCIO DELIO & PETERSON121 WHITNEY AVENEW HAVEN, CT 06510-1241UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FIBER PULP PREPARATIONS IN THE NATURE OF FILTERING MATERIALS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CONSUMER AIR AND WATER FILTERS, AND FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF COMMERCIAL AND FOOD SERVICE ACTIVATED CARBON FILTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | FILTERS MADE OF FIBER FOR WATER FILTRATION, NAMELY, CARBON FIBER, CELLULOSE-BASED FIBER; WATER FILTERS FOR DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL USE; FILTERS FOR WATER PURIFICATION APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KX TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KX TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KX Industries, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by KX Industries, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named NANOTEKX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |