USPTO serial 76642730
A AURIEGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A AURIEGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simor L. Moskowitz
Simor L. Moskowitz JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 SEVENTH STREET, N.W.THE JENIFER BUILDINGWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, CLEANSING LOTIONS, MILKS, EMULSIONS, SCRUBS, SOAPS, PERFUME, ESSENTIAL OILS; MAKE-UP, NAMELY, LIPSTICKS, LIP GELS, LIP LINERS, MASCARA, BLUSH, EYE LINER, EYE SHADOW, POWDER FOUNDATION, LIQUID FOUNDATION, CONCEALING CREAMS; SHAVING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, AFTER-SHAVE, AFTER-SHAVE BALM, SHAVING GEL; NAIL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, NAIL OIL, NAIL HARDENER; BATH AND SHOWER GELS; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, LOTIONS, CREAMS, CLEANSERS, SCRUBS, PEELS, EXFOLIANTS, SERUMS, MASKS AND TONERS FOR HYDRATING; MOISTURIZING, ANTI-AGING, OXYGENATING AND TONING; HAIR CARE AND HAIR STYLING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, LOTIONS, SPRAYS, GELS, MOUSSES, LACQUERS AND BALMS; DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE; SUN-TANNING PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, GELS, LOTIONS AND OILS; ANTI-AGING SUN CARE CREAMS, SUNSCREEN CREAMS, OILS, GELS AND LOTIONS; AFTER SUN PREPARATIONS NAMELY, COSMETIC BALMS, BODY MILK, OIL, SELF TANNING SPRAYS, CREAMS, OILS, GELS AND LOTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | VITAMIN-BASED PREPARATIONS USED FOR HYDRATING, OXYGENATING AND OTHERWISE FIGHTING THE EFFECTS OF AGING; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | BEAUTY SALONS; HAIRDRESSING SALONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe pour le Developpement de l'Industrie Chimique et Cosmetique - Dexi International
- Other trademarks owned by Societe pour le Developpement de l'Industrie Chimique et Cosmetique - Dexi International
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named A AURIEGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |