Drawing for MAXXLITE ATTACK PACK

USPTO serial 76642792

MAXXLITE ATTACK PACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXXLITE ATTACK PACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, HATS, SAFETY HELMETS, JACKETS, VESTS, PANTS, OVERALLS, SHIRTS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, UNDERSHIRTS, UNDERPANTS, JUMP SUITS, WET-SUITS, BODY SUITS, GLOVES, GLOVES, NAMELY, GAUNTLETS, SAFETY GOGGLES, PROTECTIVE GLASSES, PROTECTION MASKS, BELTS, SUSPENDERS, SHOES, AND BOOTS, FOR PROTECTION AGAINST FIRE, HEAT, WATER, PERFORATION, CHEMICALS, GASES, GERMS, BACTERIA, BLOOD, AND BODY FLUIDSABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Mar 26, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Mar 15, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 1, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 3, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 9, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 9, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 18, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 18, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Mar 5, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 5, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 1, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 31, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 9, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance