USPTO serial 76642792
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SPERIAN PROTECTIVE APPAREL, LTD./SPERIAN VETEMENTS DE PROTECTION LTEE
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN PROTECTIVE APPAREL, LTD./SPERIAN VETEMENTS DE PROTECTION LTEE
SPERIAN PROTECTIVE APPAREL, LTD./SPERIAN VETEMENTS DE PROTECTION LTEE
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by SPERIAN PROTECTIVE APPAREL, LTD./SPERIAN VETEMENTS DE PROTECTION LTEE
Bacou-Dalloz Protective Apparel Ltd./ Bacou-Dalloz Vetements de Protection Ltee
Montreal, Quebec H2W 2R2, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, HATS, SAFETY HELMETS, JACKETS, VESTS, PANTS, OVERALLS, SHIRTS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, UNDERSHIRTS, UNDERPANTS, JUMP SUITS, WET-SUITS, BODY SUITS, GLOVES, GLOVES, NAMELY, GAUNTLETS, SAFETY GOGGLES, PROTECTIVE GLASSES, PROTECTION MASKS, BELTS, SUSPENDERS, SHOES, AND BOOTS, FOR PROTECTION AGAINST FIRE, HEAT, WATER, PERFORATION, CHEMICALS, GASES, GERMS, BACTERIA, BLOOD, AND BODY FLUIDS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |