USPTO serial 76642874
WINTER GRIPS SNOW & ICE T R A C T I O N A I D IT'S LIKE A TOW TRUCK IN YOUR TRUCK!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINTER GRIPS SNOW & ICE T R A C T I O N A I D IT'S LIKE A TOW TRUCK IN YOUR TRUCK!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint-Laurent (Quebec) H4T 1V3, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicle parts, namely, snow and ice traction devices for tires | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |