USPTO serial 76642935
LIGHTNING TABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTNING TABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
2408 Nicosia, CY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely arranging, organizing and providing gaming events and gaming competitions; providing a website for the playing of card games and casino type games and for competitions for those games via the global computer network, wireless networks an interactive television and providing information related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |