USPTO serial 76643066
1ST ROUND DRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1ST ROUND DRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic Beverages, namely Draft Beer and Light Beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fowlks, Alyson
- Other trademarks owned by Fowlks, Alyson
- Other trademarks owned by Fowlks, Stanley
- Other trademarks owned by Fowlks, Stanley
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named 1ST ROUND DRAFT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |