USPTO serial 76643675
FUNCTIONOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUNCTIONOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polyols and blended polyols for use in the manufacture of sugar-free foods, sugar-free confectionaries, foods, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, oral hygiene products, chewing gums, tobaccos, food additives, elastomers, and adhesives, and for use as preservatives of sugar-free foods, sugar-free confectionaries, foods, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, oral hygiene products, chewing gums, and tobaccos, and for use as carriers or dilutents of colorants in foods, pharmaceuticals, oral hygiene products, and chewing gums, and for use as humectants in moisture foods and tobacco products, and for use a textural and mouth-feel enhancers in foods, and for use a crystal modifiers to suppress crystal growth during freezing foods and in frozen foods, and for use as nutrients in pharmaceutical fermentation, and for use as carriers or dilutents in pharmaceutical preparations and foods, and for use in manufacturing engine and machine coolants, namely, freezing point depressants and heat transfer fluids, and grinding aids, namely, dust suppressants | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Polyols and blended polyols for use as food grade lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Polyols and blended polyols for use as flavors and flavor enhancers in sugar-free foods, sugar-free confectionaries, foods, oral hygiene products, chewing gums, and tobaccos | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Polyols and blended polyols for use as visual enhancers, namely glazes for animal feeds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Cremer North America, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Peter Cremer North America, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named FUNCTIONOLS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |