Drawing for SHADOWGLIDE

USPTO serial 76644023

SHADOWGLIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHADOWGLIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce H. Troxell

BRUCE H TROXELL TROXELL LAW OFFICE PLLC5205 LEESBURG PIKE STE 1404FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041-3894UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal jalousies, metal window shutters, metal rolling window shutters, metal windows, metal doors, metal lattices, metal curtain walls, metal door frames, metal window frames, metal window casements, metal window sills, metal sash fasteners for windowsACTIVE
019Non metal and non textiles outdoor blinds, non metal jalousies, non-metal window shutters, nonmetal windows, non metal doorsACTIVE
020Window blinds, indoor window blinds, window shades, Venetian blinds, curtain rods, curtain rails, non metal curtain rings, non textile material curtain holds, curtain hooks, curtain rollers, metal curtain ringsACTIVE
024Curtains, net curtains, window curtains, curtain fabrics, curtains made of textile or plastics, curtain for showers, curtain holders of textile materials, curtain loops made of textile materials, curtain tiebacks of textileACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 27, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance