USPTO serial 76644784
CJ CLEANING & DETAILING, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3414890Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 2008
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CJ CLEANING & DETAILING, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CLEANING OF NEW CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL HOMES, COMMERCIAL OFFICES AND COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS; HOME DETAILING, NAMELY, DEEP CLEANING OF THE WINDOWS AND EVERYTHING IN THE HOME | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Catherine Evans-Jeffress
- Other trademarks owned by Catherine Evans-Jeffress
- Other trademarks owned by Catherine Evans-Jeffress
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named CJ CLEANING & DETAILING, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2006 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |