USPTO serial 76644821
VALUE ENHANCEMENT FRAMEWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3346571Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VALUE ENHANCEMENT FRAMEWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, L6M 2T7, Ontario, CA
Oakville, L6M 2T7, Ontario, CA
Oakville, L6M 2T7, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Ducatman
ROBERT P DUCATMAN JONES DAYN POINT, 901 LAKESIDE AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pamphlets, books, newsletters, brochures, magazines, reports, journals, manuals and guides on the subject of planning and executing the sale of a private company | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Providing business management consulting services to businesses on how to effectively plan and execute the sale of a private company and the business management consulting services provided via the Internet on how to effectively plan and execute the sale of a private company | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting courses, seminars, workshops, classes and web casts on developing and executing strategies and procedures to effectively and profitably sell a private company | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Howard
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Howard
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Howard
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VALUE ENHANCEMENT FRAMEWORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |