USPTO serial 76645167
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William S. Strong
WILLIAM S STRONG KOTIN, CRABTREE & STRONG LLP1 BOWDOIN SQ STE 800BOSTON, MA 02114-2925UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publication and online publication of books, textbooks, manuals and educational materials, namely brochures, leaflets, journals and pamphlets, designed to assist school districts and other educational officials in raising the achievement of struggling students | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
| 041 | Professional development, namely teacher coaching and consulting services, designed to assist school districts and other educational officials in raising the achievement of struggling students | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |