USPTO serial 76645256
FLEX-LAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEX-LAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cannon Falls, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce T. Margulies
BRUCE T MARGULIES NEIFELD IP LAW PC4813B EISENHOWER AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22304-4832UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | House vacuum systems comprising vacuum cleaners and pumps | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Laboratory ventilation hoods and laboratory electrical control panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Modular, prefabricated, reconfigurable, and portable laboratory equipment, namely lighting fixtures, electric heating fans, steam generators, ventilating exhaust fans, regulating accessories for water supply, namely metered valves, pipes being parts of sanitary facilities, DI water systems and heating systems composed primarily of tubes, pipes, and pre-assembled manifolds through which cold or low temperature water circulates, modular HVAC comprising air conditioning units and heating furnaces, compressed air and compressed gas comprising dryers for the removal of solid, liquid and vapor contaminants from compressed air and gases, back and power scrubbing comprising electro-chemical flue gas scrubbing machines, clean electric power and backup power comprising electric lighting fixtures, namely power failure backup safety lighting, clean room walls, microenvironment for preparation of semiconductor samples, namely enclosed air filtration units | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation of laboratory equipment and modular laboratory clean walls | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Laboratory research in the fields of semiconductors and biotechnology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OSEMI, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLEX-LAB
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |