USPTO serial 76645673
AMERICAN FLAVOUR POLO CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICAN FLAVOUR POLO CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Schavey Ruff
DEBORAH SCHAVEY RUFF MAYER, BROWN, ROWE, & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | cigarettes and tobacco | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |