USPTO serial 76645750
ORVAL KENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2007
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ORVAL KENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Schaumburg, IL, US
Schaumburg, IL, US
Beaverton, OR, US
Schaumburg, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yvonne E. Tingleaf
Yvonne E. Tingleaf Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.1211 SW 5th Ave, Suite 1800Portland, OR 97204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared salads, namely, fruit salad, garden salad, vegetable salad, bean salad, egg salad, chicken salad, tuna salad, ham salad, turkey salad, and potato salad; dips; vegetable based spreads and cheese spreads; prepared and frozen entrees, side dishes and appetizers consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; dips and cream cheese; shrimp salad; crabmeat salad; artichoke salad; mushroom salad; red skinned potato salad, and cole slaw; barbecue chicken; prepared entrees consisting primarily of sweet and sour chicken with mostaccioli pasta with meat sauce; meat salad; seafood salad; vegetable salad; vegetable with meat salad; processed fruit pieces; country potato with egg salad; southern mustard potato salad; dixie cole slaw salad; sour cream and dill potato salad; bbq beans salad; gourmet potato salad; reduced fat mustard potato salad; fresh and processed meats | ACTIVE | Jun 12, 2005 |
| 030 | prepared salads, namely macaroni salad and pasta salad; sauces; prepared and frozen entrees, side dishes and appetizers consisting primarily of pasta or rice; rice pudding, tapioca pudding, cream desserts, Hawaiian salad dessert, cheesecake, and gelatin parfait, whipped desserts made primarily of fruit/nuts and whipped topping; tapioca pudding salad; pasta salad with salami and pepperoni; tortellini (pasta) salad with meat; pastry; antipasto salad; rotelli pasta salad, macaroni salad, and creamy pasta salad; prepared entrees consisting primarily of mostaccioli pasta with meat sauce sweet and sour chicken; cheese tortellini marinara; dry beeffajita mix; cheese ravioli with tomato sauce; lasagna with meat sauce; macaroni and cheese; vegetable lasagna; dry chicken fajita mix; cheese tortellini vinaigrette, dill pasta salad with chicken, and tarragon pasta salad with tuna fowl salad; pasta salad with fowl; pasta salad with meat; pasta salad with seafood; pasta salad with vegetables herb salad with potatoes; pasta salad with vegetables, pasta primavera salad, honey mustard pasta salad, and vermicelli salad; elbow macaroni salads; macaroni and cheese salad; sour cream and cheddar macaroni salad; Italian pasta salad; reduced fat elbow macaroni salad; and rice pudding salad | ACTIVE | Jun 12, 2005 |
| 031 | Fresh fruit pieces | ACTIVE | Jun 12, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Orval Kent Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Orval Kent Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RESER'S FINE FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Orval Kent Food Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named ORVAL KENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 6, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 6, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 1, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |