USPTO serial 76645917
SHOREI-KAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHOREI-KAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen A. Monroe
KAREN A MONROE SILLER WILK LLP675 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing instruction in the art of self-defense through the teaching of the techniques of karate | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1968 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |