USPTO serial 76646014
DOÑA TOÑA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOÑA TOÑA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emma Pena Madrid
Emma Pena Madrid MARQUEZ BROTHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.5801 RUE FERRARISAN JOSE, CA 95138UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese, cream, cream cheese, cheese spreads, milk, fish, sardines, pork, sausages, chili, processed nuts, pork rinds, canned fruits, fruit paste, soups, soup mixes, processed beans, dried beans, processed peppers, processed tomatoes, canned vegetables, processed edible seeds, edible processed cactus, cooking oil, edible oil, vegetable oil, vegetable based food beverages, unflavored and unsweetened gelatins, candied fruits, candied nuts, chocolate milk, clam juice, eggnog, eggnog mixes, fruit conserves, fruit pectin, fruit preserves, processed vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chewing gum, flavored and sweetened gelatins, honey, pasta shells, rice, tortillas, tortilla chips, corn chips, salsa, cheese sauce, tomato sauce, spices, processed herbs, bakery products, bakery goods, bakery desserts, cake mixes, chili sauce, chili seasoning, chocolate food beverages not dairy or vegetable based, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chutney, cinnamon, coffee beans, crackers, dried chili peppers, flavored ices, flavored sweetened gelatin desserts, hominy, hominy grits, ice cream drinks, sauces, seasonings, shakes, sherbet, sorbet, taco shells, processed corn | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquez Brothers International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marquez Brothers International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DOÑA TOÑA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |