Drawing for FABULOUS FREDDIES ITALIAN EATERY

USPTO serial 76646021

FABULOUS FREDDIES ITALIAN EATERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FABULOUS FREDDIES ITALIAN EATERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brecken J. Cutler

BRECKEN J CUTLER UNGARETTI & HARRIS LLP3 1ST NATIONAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60602-4252UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043restaurants; namely restaurants providing take-out and fast food servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 9, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Feb 29, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Feb 29, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Dec 31, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 29, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 29, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 24, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 24, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 24, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance