USPTO serial 76646217
#1 PRINCESS PLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with #1 PRINCESS PLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan A. Grode
SUSAN A. GRODE KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 2600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, playthings, and sporting goods, namely, action figures and accessories therefore; stuffed toy animals; baby multiple activity toys; toy bakeware and cookware; balloons; toy banks; bath toys; bathtub toys; inflatable bath toys; ride-on toys; inflatable ride-on toys, equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; toy cars; dolls, beanbag dolls; paper dolls, rag dolls, soft sculpture dolls, doll accessories and playsets therefor, namely, doll cases, doll clothing; doll house furnishings, doll costumes; stuffed toys; checker sets; chess sets; children's play cosmetics; children's multiple activity toys; toy construction blocks; infant action crib toys; flying discs; electronic hand held game units; electronic game equipment with a watch function; electronically operated toy motor vehicles; board games and game equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; card games; manipulative games; parlor games; role-playing games; stand-alone video parlor computer game machines; action type target games; video and computer game cartridges; coin operated and non coin operated video output game machines; rocking horses; jigsaw puzzles; kites; manipulative puzzles; paper face masks; toy model train sets; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; electronically operated toy motor vehicles; toy magic tricks, toy whistles; party favors in the nature of small toys; toy cap pistols; plush toys; soft sculpture plush toys; manipulative puzzles, namely, three dimensional cube type puzzles; toy record player for playing tunes and cassettes and discs therefor; skateboards; ice skates; toy roller skates; toy in-line skates and accessories, namely, knee, wrist, and elbow pads; water squirting toys; teddy bears; wind up walking toys; wind up toys; non-motorized non-electric mobile self-propelled riding toys; toy trucks; twirling batons; toy zip guns; gymnastic apparatus; balls, namely, playground balls, soccer balls, sport balls, baseballs, basketballs, and foam balls; baseball gloves; swimming aids, namely, swimming floats for recreational use; head covers for golf clubs; golf balls; golf clubs; inflatable swimming pools for recreational use; kick board floatation devices for recreational use; gymnastic parallel bars; skis; snow skis; snow boards; skipping ropes; jump ropes; snow sleds for recreational use; surf fins; surfboards; swim boards for recreational use; body boards; swim fins; inflatable and buoyant bath toys; swimming and ride on toys; musical toys; latex squeeze toys; exercise equipment, namely, stationery bikes, treadmills, stair stepping machines; exercise equipment, namely, weight lifting machines, and free weights; playing cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PBMR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |