USPTO serial 76646229
SOUND POPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUND POPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | HARD CANDY, CONFECTIONERY DROPS, BOILED SWEETS, LOLLIPOPS OF ANY KIND, PASTILLES, HARDENED JELLY CANDY, CHEWABLE JELLY CANDY, FRUIT JELLIES, BUBBLE GUM, CHEWING GUM, JELLY BEANS, LICORICE, CHOCOLATE, MARZIPAN, ICE CREAM, ICE LOLLIES, CANDY STRIPS, LIQUID CANDY, CANDY GEL, CANDY CONTAINING JUICE, MARSHMALLOWS, CANDY FOAM, CANDY POWDER, BISCUITS, CAKES, AND PASTRIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |