USPTO serial 76646426
THE IRON MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE IRON MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN OPERATING INTERACTIVE, MULTI-PLAYER GAMES ON VIDEO GAME MACHINES, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, DIGITAL TELEPHONES, AND HANDHELD PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, AND DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | May 1, 2005 |
| 041 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING AND PLAYING INTERACTIVE COMPUTER GAMES, PROVIDING ONLINE CHAT ROOMS AND BULLETIN BOARDS FOR TRANSMISSION OF MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING THE PLAYING OF COMPUTER GAMES; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE COMPUTER GAME AND A CONTINUING ANIMATED SHOW AND ANIMATED MOVIES DISTRIBUTED OVER THE INTERNET, SATELLITE, CABLE, AUDIO AND VIDEO MEDIA | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | May 1, 2005 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF CONTENT AND SERVICE DELIVERY FOR A MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT PROGRAMS FOR USE ON MOBILE DEVICES VIA A MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF LOCATION SERVICES FOR USE ON MOBILE DEVICES VIA A MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION INTEGRATION SERVICES BASED ON A USER PROFILE, PREFERENCES SCHEDULE AND LOCATION IN ORDER TO DELIVER PERSONALIZED AND EVENT-SPECIFIC COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | May 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |