Drawing for STREAMCAST

USPTO serial 76646959

STREAMCAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STREAMCAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software that enables multiple simultaneous multicast sources on the same Virtual Local Area NetworkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 5, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 5, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 21, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 25, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Jun 25, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 1, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 1, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 1, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 1, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
May 13, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 13, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 11, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 31, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 30, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance