CopyMark Law Group
4.9
Drawing for HABITAT

USPTO serial 76647058

HABITAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 604
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HABITAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019INFLATABLE SHELTERS USED IN WELDING OPERATIONS TO ISOLATE THE WELDING OPERATION FROM THE EXTERIOR ENVIRONMENTABANDONEDJun 3, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2012MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 17, 2012ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 17, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 17, 2012OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 10, 2011EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 8, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 8, 2007OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 10, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance