Drawing for CYBER PORTAL

USPTO serial 76647087

CYBER PORTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBER PORTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allen R. Kipnes

ALLEN R KIPNES WATOV & KIPNES PCPO BOX 247PRINCETON JUNCTION, NJ 08550-0247UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Lottery tickets, namely, a scratch-off lottery ticket wherein a code is hidden by a scratch-off layer and exposed by the player, the code is transmitted to a computer having internet access enabling the player to play a game on the computerACTIVE
041Lottery services provided to a lottery sponsor enabling a lottery sponsor to sponsor a lottery game employing lottery tickets, namely, a scratch-off lottery ticket wherein a code is hidden by a scratch-off layer and exposed by the player, the code is transmitted to a computer having internet access enabling the player to play a game on the computerACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 23, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 9, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 26, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 28, 2007PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED
Sep 23, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Aug 2, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 28, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 16, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance