Drawing for SMART HAMMER

USPTO serial 76647369

SMART HAMMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3266502Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2007
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART HAMMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007earth boring machines, namely, pneumatically operated impact boring toolsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Jun 27, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 26, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Jun 26, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2007R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 8, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 7, 2007CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
May 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Mar 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance