Drawing for HURRICANE GRILL · WINGS

USPTO serial 76647934

HURRICANE GRILL · WINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HURRICANE GRILL · WINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Carrithers

DAVID W CARRITHERS CARRITHERS LAW OFFICE PLLCONE PARAGON CTR6060 DUTCHMAN'S LN STE 140LOUISVILLE, KY 40205

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Restaurant and cocktail lounge servicesACTIVEJun 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Nov 5, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Aug 28, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jul 5, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance