USPTO serial 76648080
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Playa Vista, CA
Playa Vista, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Removable plastic covers used to protect automotive Vehicle Identification Number from being viewed | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2007 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| May 31, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |