Drawing for KWANGJUYO

USPTO serial 76648086

KWANGJUYO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KWANGJUYO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021PANS; TEA INFUSERS, NON-ELECTRIC, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; POTS, NON-ELECTRIC, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; PITCHERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; TEAPOTS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; HOT POTS, NON-ELECTRICALLY HEATED; KETTLES, NON-ELECTRIC; NON-ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKERS; COOKING STEAMERS; KOREAN RICE BOWLS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; KOREAN STYLE SOUP BOWLS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; MUGS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; SAUCERS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; DRINKING CUPS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; DISHES, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; TEACUPS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; COFFEE CUPS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; BASINS,BOWLS; NAPKIN HOLDERS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; URNS, NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; TRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, POTTERY, NAMELY, CERAMIC VASES, VESSELS, BOWLS, PLATES AND POTS; VASES, NOT OF PRECIOUS METALACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 1, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 2, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 20, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance