USPTO serial 76648090
FRESCOS & COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESCOS & COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared and packaged ready to cook, ready to assemble, ready to heat, ready to eat, and ready to serve foods and meals in the nature of fresh, frozen and refrigerated entrees consisting primarily of meat, poultry, seafood, fish, frozen fruit and vegetables, namely, kebabs, brochettes and satay sticks; soups, stews; meat, poultry, seafood and fish casseroles; breaded chicken sticks, chicken nuggets, chicken morsels, frozen vegetable morsels and vegetable sticks, pork nuggets, pork morsels, beef nuggets, beef morsels; meat, namely, game, beef, pork, veal, processed lamb; fresh and frozen meat products, namely sausage, meat loaf, meat paste, meat balls, pastrami, meat juices, blood sausage, frankfurters, hamburgers, hot dogs, meat-based mousse, meat-based spreads, ham, bacon, salami, mortadella, bacon rinds, roast beef, corned beef, beef patties, sausage patties, meat croquettes; poultry, namely, chicken, turkey, duck; fish; seafood, namely, scallops, lobster, crab, shrimp, seafood stuffed fish fillets; tofu, meat pies, French fries and potatoes; prepared and frozen vegetables; prepared and frozen fruits; salads, namely coleslaw, vegetable, seafood, Greek, salmon, chicken, pea, bean, spinach and fruit salads; prepared entrees and appetizers consisting primarily of meat, poultry, seafood, frozen fruit and vegetables; apple sauce; cranberry sauce;dips, namely humus, tzatziki made of yogurt, seafood, spinach, crab, artichoke and tomato basil dips; condiments, namely, pepper oil; breakfast foods, namely, fruit salad, hash browns, potato patties, potato wedges | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared and packaged ready to cook, ready to assemble, ready to heat, ready to eat and ready to serve foods and meals in the nature of fresh, frozen and refrigerated entrees consisting primarily of rice, pasta and dough, namely, rice, noodles, pastas, egg rolls, quiche, couscous, orzo, polenta and pizzas; prepared entrees and appetizers and bakery products, namely, breads, rolls, croutons, cookies, biscuits, doughnuts, croissants, brioches, tarts, crackers, bagels, danishes, chelsea buns, English muffins, muffins, pastries and muffin mixes; desserts, namely, pies, fruit crisps, cakes, cake and pastry squares, candy bars, cinnamon buns, eclairs, bakery dessert shells, puddings and mousses; salads, namely, macaroni, noodle, potato, rice and pasta salads; tabbouleh; sauces, namely pesto sauce, spaghetti sauce, fruit sauces, tartar sauce, tomato sauce, artichoke sauce, barbecue sauce, chili sauce, hot sauce and pizza sauce; salad dressing; marinades; spices; seasonings; condiments, namely, pepper sauce, ketchup, mustard, pimento; seasonings, namely, curry pastes and powders; sandwiches; ice cream; breakfast foods, namely, cereal, waffles, pancakes, coffee cake, breakfast pastries and breakfast burritos | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail services, namely the operation of retail stores and outlets specializing in prepared food products of all types | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |