USPTO serial 76648118
FARROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FARROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EXTON, PA
Loddon, Norwich, NR14 6JD, GB
Loddon, Norwich, NR14 6JD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Galgano
THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & ASSOCIATES PLLC20 W PARK AVE STE 204LONG BEACH, NY 11561UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | UNPROCESSED ARTIFICIAL RESIN FOR USE AS AN ABRASIVE FOR CLEANING SURFACES; SILICONES AND SILICATES, NAMELY OLIVINE FOR USE IN INDUSTRY; CHEMICALS FOR USE IN INDUSTRY, NAMELY, OLIVINE | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | ABRASIVE SAND FOR USE IN SAND BLASTING; CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS FOR USE WITH INDUSTRIAL CLEANING MACHINES; SAND PAPER AND SAND CLOTH; PAINT AND SUBSTANCE STRIPPERS AND REMOVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS FOR USE IN CLEANING, CUTTING, STRIPPING, POLISHING, SCOURING, ABRADING AND SAND BLASTING OF MATERIALS; MOTORS AND INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; MACHINE COUPLING AND TRANSMISSION PARTS; INDUSTRIAL CLEANING MACHINES FOR PAINT AND GRIME REMOVAL AND FOR CLEANING SURFACES; COMPRESSORS FOR MACHINES; MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF FOR USE WITH PRESSURIZED LIQUIDS FOR WASHING AND CLEANING; MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF FOR STRIPPING AND CLEANING SURFACES THAT UTILIZE HEAT AND STEAM; SAND BLASTING MACHINES AND PARTS THEREOF; AND PARTS FOR ALL THE FOREGOING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FARROW HOLDINGS GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FARROW SYSTEM LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FARROW SYSTEM LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named FARROW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |