USPTO serial 76648273
DILT-XL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DILT-XL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W ADAMS NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2009 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |