USPTO serial 76649362
MYPHOTOBOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYPHOTOBOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92637 Weiden, DE
Neustadt a.d. Waldnaab, DE
Neustadt a.d. Waldnaab, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus P. Dolce
AARON J WONG PRICE HENEVELD LLPPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, ILLUSTRATED BOOKS, COFFEE TABLE BOOKS, PICTURE BOOKS, AND PHOTO BOOKS FEATURING A COLLECTION OF CUSTOMER-SPECIFIC PHOTOGRAPHS AND/OR TEMPLATES; PHOTO ALBUMS AND ALBUMS FOR PHOTO COLLECTIONS; PAPER; STATIONERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | DATA PROCESSING SERVICES; COLLECTION, PREPARATION, COMPOSITION, STORAGE, PROCESSING, ACQUISITION AND PROVISION OF BUSINESS INFORMATION, DATA, STATISTICS AND INDICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA AND GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPHIC, CABLE, AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; COMPUTER-AIDED TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION AND IMAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | STORAGE OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA, NAMELY, IMAGES, TEXT AND AUDIO DATA; STORAGE SERVICES FOR ARCHIVING DATABASES, IMAGES AND OTHER ELECTRONIC DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by myPixx AG
- Other trademarks owned by MOTIONDRIVE AG
- Other trademarks owned by MOTIONDRIVE AG
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named MYPHOTOBOOK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |