USPTO serial 76649960
EATING RIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3753482Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2010
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EATING RIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gigi Remington
Gigi Remington Safeway, Inc.11555 Dublin Canyon RdPleasanton, CA 94588UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared or packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; soups, [hummus;] processed vegetables; processed, canned, dried, or preserved fruits; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; dairy-based beverages; snack foods consisting primarily of potato crisps and soy crisps; oils for cooking; oils for food; [snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips;] snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and raisins; prepared salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salad; fruit preserves[; cheese] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 2004 |
| 030 | Frozen, prepared or packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; pasta, breakfast cereals; flour-based, corn-based or grain-based chips; macaroni and cheese, [frozen pizzas,] salad dressings; sauces, crackers, granola-based snack bars, oatmeal; grain-based food bars also containing dried fruit; muffins; bread; waffles, tea-based beverages; sandwiches; seasonings;[ ice cream and frozen yogurt;] herbal food beverages; noodles, sauces and seasonings, namely, sauce and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; snack foods consisting primarily of pita chips and seven-grain chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 2007 |
| 031 | [Fresh vegetables; fresh fruit] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 2007 |
| 032 | [Iced and frozen fruit beverages and smoothies; sports drinks] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFEWAY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFEWAY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFEWAY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named EATING RIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 2, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |