USPTO serial 76652334
VIRTUAL PLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL PLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tokyo 100-0004, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald R. Snider
RONALD R SNIDER SNIDER & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 27613WASHINGTON, DC 20038-7613UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic applications equipment; Computers; Electronic publication; Computer program | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical equipment; Viewer for medical equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design/computer programming/maintenance of computer software; Rental of computer; Rental of measuring instrument; Providing computer program; Technical advice relating to performance, operation, etc; of computers and other machines that require high levels of personal knowledge, skill or experience of the operators to meet the required accuracy in operating them | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |