USPTO serial 76652657
MURIGREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3625002Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 26, 2009
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MURIGREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Le Gardeur, Quebec, CA
Le Gardeur, Quebec, CA
Le Gardeur, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. YATES DOWELL, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELL PC2111 EISENHOWER AVE STE 406ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-4679UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 26, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |