USPTO serial 76659576
STRENGTH IN DATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRENGTH IN DATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Lee, Jr.
Robert E. Lee, Jr. Eli Lilly and CompanyLilly Corporate CenterIndianapolis, IN 46285UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL INFORMATION MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS AND BROCHURES IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE AND PHARMACEUTICALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |