USPTO serial 76659783
EATING RIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EATING RIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan S. Weinstein
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Full line of meats; full line of poultry; full line of processed vegetables; full line of processed, canned, dried, or preserved fruits; full line of frozen, prepared or packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; full line of dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; full line of dairy-based beverages; full line of fish not live; full line of fruit-based organic food bars, snack foods and spreads; soy chips; potato crisps; full line of oils for cooking; full line of oils for food; margarine; full line of snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; full line of snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and raisins; full line of soups; prepared salad except macaroni, rice and pasta salad; fruit preserves; hummus; cheese; soy, turkey and veggie burger patties; chili; and potato salad | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Full line of frozen, prepared or packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; full line of pasta; full line of prepared coffee and coffee beverages; full line of prepared tea and tea-based beverages; full line of bakery goods; full line of baking powders and spices; full line of breakfast cereals, full line of candies; full line of chocolates; full line of flavorings; full line of flour-based, corn-based or grain-based chips; full line of frozen confections, frozen yogurt, frozen custard and fruit ices; full line of ice creams; full line of herbal food beverages; macaroni and cheese; mixes for bakery goods; noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; full line of frozen and prepared pizzas; salad dressings; sauces; sandwiches; seasonings; spices; sugar and sugar substitutes; non-organic and non-allergy sensitive cookies; crackers; granola, granola snacks,granola-based snack bars; oatmeal; grain-based food bars also containing dried fruit; muffins; bread and bread products, namely, wraps; tortillas; salsa; macaroni salad; waffles | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Full line of fresh vegetables and fruits | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Full line of fruit beverages and juices, water beverages, soft drinks, energy drinks, iced and frozen fruit beverages and smoothies; sports drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFEWAY INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFEWAY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named EATING RIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |