USPTO serial 76660855
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Aliso Viejo, CA
Aliso Viejo, CA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
ALISO VIEJO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albin H. Gess
ALBIN H GESS SNELL & WILMER LLP600 Anton BoulevardSuite 1400COSA MESA, CA 92626-7689| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Procurement services, namely, procurement of contract labor services for others for software design and development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 3, 1999 |
| 042 | consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer software and computer software systems for others; consulting services in the field of testing computer software systems for others; maintenance of computer software systems for others; migration of application software from one operating system to another for others; and consulting services in the field of information technology, namely, software architecture and design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |