Drawing for COLORS

USPTO serial 76660859

COLORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COLORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Albin H. Gess

ALBIN H GESS SNELL & WILMER LLP600 ANTON BLVD STE 1400COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7689UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035procurement of labor contracting services for software design and development for othersACTIVE
042consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer software and computer software systems for others; consulting services in the field of testing computer software systems for others; maintenance of computer software systems for others; migration of application software from one operating system to another for others; and consulting services in the field of information technology, namely software architecture and designACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2009CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jan 8, 2009CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Nov 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 4, 2008CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 27, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 10, 2006MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance