USPTO serial 76660991
SIMPLEHUMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLEHUMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Sun
RAYMOND SUN LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND SUN12420 WOODHALL WAYTUSTIN, CA 92782-1165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal step ladders | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Non-metal step ladders; Bag clips, namely, plastic clips for sealing bags; and Bathroom organizers, namely, shelving, drawers and storage racks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household cleaning tools and cloths, namely, mops, brooms, bath brushes, clothes brushes, fireplace brushes, floor brushes, hair brushes, make-up brushes, nail brushes, pot cleaning brushes, scraping brushes, shaving brushes, tub brushes, brushes for brushing food during the preparation of food, cleaning cloths, dusting cloths, eyeglass cleaning cloths, shoe shine cloths, Wood and bamboo utensils, namely, chopsticks, serving tongs, cooking skewers, serving spoons, serving ladles, serving forks, bowls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Simplehuman LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Simplehuman LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SIMPLEHUMAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |