USPTO serial 76661100
CROSS FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CROSS FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Buena Park, CA
Buena Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
Thomas I. Rozsa Rozsa Law Group LC18757 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 220Tarzana, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUTOMOBILE SOUND SYSTEM EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, LOUDSPEAKERS, AMPLIFIERS, SIGNAL PROCESSORS AND ENCLOSURES THEREFOR, VEHICLE ELECTRONIC ACCESSORIES, NAMELY VIDEO PANELS, NAMELY VIDEO LCD PANELS FOR GPS NAVIGATORS AND ALSO FOR FLAT PANEL VIDEO SCREEN TO VIEW TELEVISION, CDs AND DVDs ALL FOR USE IN A VEHICLE AND HANDS-FREE ELECTRONICS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC HANDS-FREE DEVICES FOR USE WITH A CELLULAR TELEPHONE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |